When the Chickens ARE Home To ROOST

September 1, 2008 at 11:17 pm (Uncategorized)

We, as a community, look upon our young women from two separate points. One for men, one for women, ( As ‘fathers’, as ‘mothers’. ). We see these wonderful bundles of attitude and energy in their ‘embryonic’ states of what we’d like to see them become; doctors, scientists, lawyers… Presidents of a corporation, or a university, maybe even this country. These ideals are what we’ve had drummed into our heads for both of our children’s sexes futures since we were stolen from the “continent of beginning”.

unbought and unbossed.

unbought and unbossed.

It’s been a long road to this point and we’ve just begun to show the world what we’re made of, besides ‘SPORTING ENTERTAINMENT’.

The world has looked on our women with desire, in every aspect. They tan, they’ll create that 19th century fashion favorite, the ‘BUSTLE’. A European mechanical “copy” of Dr. Livingston’s marveling encounter with his first viewing of a Hottentot woman’s physique, [europe\'s inspiration for the Bustle.]

Since the days of Colonialist global rape, in the name of science and exploration, the way of life known to those who’d been in existence when the pale races were doing the proverbial squat have been looked upon with disgust, disfavor, or both… but used as a mantle of “brilliance” in a world that shuns us. Our young women have been a secret obsession to many, but scorned even to the rankings of societal taboos… Until NOW! The very thoughts, attitudes and situations that have been around ’society’ since the first HOMO SAPIENS almost 300,000 years past. Now those late bloomers are in the middle of what we’ve known for EONS, LIFE and DEATH happen on their own time and schedules, no matter who attempts to make the ‘rules’ for their own private “pleasures”. This nation has sought to control how many non white persons get to “enjoy” the ideological gifts written within the CONSTITUTION, feverishly inserting boundaries of texts to curb natural occurrences through guilt instead of education and understandings. (There doesn’t have to be a written dissertation of what we all know as fact.) The notion of young people “falling” in LOVE is too old to debate, once upon a time the cultures of the world considered, (as some still culturally do.), the coupling of families be instilled upon the two young people at ages as early as five years old, where they’d begin their production of offspring at the ages of twelve to fifteen years old. At the time of writing this, New Hampshire allows this situation of consent through parents and a Judge.

But, since the time of church dictating state edicts children without the sanctity of MARRIAGE has been allowed the, seemingly, glaring differences of “white vs black” offspring “legitimacy”… UNTIL NOW. Just how will this nation react/respond to the candidate for the SECOND highest office having a daughter who wouldn’t\couldn’t practice ‘SAFE SEX’ ? And how WILL that affect the Majority RACE’S view of the , perceived cultural “differences” of WHO represents AMERICA’S TRUE IDEALS ? A black father\’s advice.

No WHITE dress for a WHITE HOUSE WEDDING here.

No WHITE dress for a WHITE HOUSE WEDDING here.

winger said it a while back.

Permalink Leave a Comment